Overcoming difficulties in privatizing roads

Walter Block
College of Business Administration
Loyola University

Overcoming difficulties in privatizing roads 

ABSTRACT

The present article considers, and rejects, four arguments against the privatization of roads, and in favor of our present system of road socialism. They are 1. Eminent domain is cheap, efficient, and necessary, but only government can avail itself of their “benefits.” 2. Roads are not perfectly competitive, but rather, necessarily, are characterized by monopolistic elements, which only the state can address. 3. Roads are different then everything else; people impose waiting costs on others without taking them into account; this externalities problem is a market failure that, again, only government can solve. 4. Road privatization is unfair to abutting property owners. In section 3, the paper deals with five objections to, or difficulties with, street and highway privatization: 1. The government has violated “Non-Compete” clauses to protect private investors in roadways. 2. Private industry would find it impossible to discern rational prices for its services. 3. Should public roads be commercialized before being privatized? That is, should the state first charge a price for these services and then privatize, or do the opposite? 4. Road privatization would be a public relations nightmare. How should this be dealt with?

1. Introduction 

For the purposes of this article, we will take it as a matter of stipulation that it is desirable to privatize all traffic arteries. That is, all extant streets, roads, avenues, highways, etc., should forthwith be taken out of the control of governments, whether federal, state or local, and placed into private hands. There is a wealth of literature attesting to the benefits of market provision of goods and services vis-à-vis governmental, in general, which is well known especially since the demise of the Soviet economy, and also with specific reference to roadways, (1) which is far less well known. Rather than reiterating the case for free enterprise in this domain vis-à-vis socialism, (2) we will instead focus in section 2 on several objections to implementation, in section 3 consider some difficulties with the transition period. We conclude in section 4. 

2. Objections

2.1 Eminent domain is cheap, efficient, and necessary

One argument against private roads is that the costs of amassing rights of way on which to build them would be enormous. Suppose a private highway company is trying to build a facility stretching from Boston to Los Angeles, or even from New Orleans to St. Louis. They have purchased sufficient acreage in order to do so, when they approach Mr. Harry Holdout, who refuses to sell at any but an astronomical price. This, alone, would put paid to the entire enterprise. Not only would not coastto-coast highways be impossible under private enterprise, but this applies to intra state roads as well. Nor would, even, city streets be free of such impediments; after all, Harry Holdouts can be found anywhere there is money to be made by obstructing progress.

No. What is needed if roads are to be built in the first place is the government, for this is the only institution in society that can rely upon powers of eminent domain. (3) Here, the state simply commandeers the property in question, paying what it determines is a fair market price. This can save millions of dollars, rendering public provision of highway building far more efficient than private.

There are difficulties with this objection. For one thing, it commits a very basic economic fallacy, a confusion of real costs with out of pocket expenses. Of course, it government sets its own price, based upon what it feels is “fair market value” this is likely to be far below the level the property owner might insist upon. But the true costs are the alternatives foregone, and no one can know them apart from the owner in question.

Even to characterize him as “Harry Holdout” is to do violence to economic reality. For anyone, in any transaction, can use such a derogation against anyone who will not sell his wares for what the buyer deems an appropriate price. The point is, there is simply no objective way to distinguish the so called holdout from any other property owner who will not sell at a price favored by the would be purchaser.

Then there is the fact that there are often several if not numerous routes that a road from one city to another could take. All one need do is purchase options to buy contiguous land, at previously agreed upon prices, and if there is any supposed “holdout” activity, e.g., high prices on the part of one or a few sellers on any of them, merely utilize another. In this way, the property owners along each of these routes are made in effect to compete with each other. And this is to say nothing of the possibility of bridging over, or tunneling under, the holdings of a recalcitrant seller. It will of course be more expensive to do so, but this expense places an upper bound upon what the road assembler need pay to any one property owner along his selected route. This analysis can also be used to refute the claim that free market operation of roads will be paralyzed, given that one road owner can always refuse to allow another to cross his own property with another such facility. Suppose that there is a road running from east to west; it does not matter whether this is a highway between two cities, or a street within any one city. Another entrepreneur wishes to install a north south road, which would have to cross the first one. He has assembled all the land he needs for this purpose, except for one parcel: the land now occupied by the east west thoroughfare. When he approaches the owner of the extant road, he is met with a stony rebuff; he refuses to sell at any price!

It is clear that without north south roads, our transportation system will collapse, perhaps before it even gets started. However, there are several difficulties with this scenario. First of all, it is exceedingly unlikely that the would be builder of the north south artery would have invested any money in his enterprise without first ensuring that he had complete right of way. Perhaps this “up and down” route could avoid the “sideways” one entirely, if the owner of the latter were adamant. Secondly, it is unlikely in the extreme that the east west corridor owner would take any such stand. After all, if no roads cross his own, then the capital value of his own possessions will be greatly attenuated. Motorists will be able to use it, only, to traverse in and east or west direction, as opposed to using virtually all 360 degrees. If he did, it is exceedingly probable that his board of directors would toss him out on his ear. Third, if all else, somehow, fails, the north south would be builder still has the same option available to him as did the land assembler we were considering above who was faced with Harry Holdout (which is precisely the role now played by the east west owner): he can build a bridge over the latter’s land, or tunnel under it. (4) 

2.2 Roads are not perfectly competitive 

A private roadway industry would not be perfectly competitive. Therefore, there would be dead weight inefficiency losses in its operation. Thus, it should not be privatized. 

There are several flaws in this objection and they are serious ones. First, a perfectly competitive industry is an utter impossibility in the real world. The requirements for this status are numerous and ridiculously otherworldly: completely homogeneous products; an indefinitely large, not to say infinite, number of both buyers (to stave off monopsony) (5) and sellers (to preclude monopoly); full and complete information about everything relevant on the part of all market participants; zero profits and equilibrium. The reductio ad absurdum of this objection is that not only could roads not be privatized under such impossible criteria, but neither could anything else be, either. That is, this is a recipe for a complete takeover by the government of the entire economy, whether by nationalization (communism) or regulation (fascism) it matters little.

Second, even if, arguendo, it were somehow possible for such a state of affairs to come into being, it would not be advantageous to mankind for it to do so. This is because perfect competition speaks only in terms of structure of industry; it is totally silent on the issue of behavior. Specifically, there is simply no room in this concept for rivalrous action, the fountainhead of true competition and progress.

2.3. Roads are different then everything else; people impose waiting costs on others without taking them into account

Consider the thinking processes of the man ready to commute to his downtown job, during the morning rush hour. He can be counted upon to take into account the degree to which the congestion he expects to find will slow him down. He would not embark upon this trip did he not regard its benefits greater than its costs, and the slowness of traffic is one of the costs he will most certainly incorporate into his decision making process.

However, in traveling on the highway at this time, he also, albeit to a very small degree, adds to the traffic congestion that would exist without his participation in it. To wit, by making this decision, he imposes waiting costs on other drivers. Does he take this second, very different cost into account? He does not! But in refraining from doing so, he acts as an external diseconomy on every other driver. Of course, he is not the only motorist to be guilty of this oversight. Our analysis is perfectly general at this point: what we have said about this one road user is true of every other one as well. Thus, all drivers in this situation impose such waiting costs on every other one of them, with not a one of them taking them into account.

Such is the objection we are now considering to road privatization.

It is a very poor one, insofar as it operates, if it does so at all, no only with regard to roads, but far more widely. This objection applies, at least in principle, to every good or service for which there are queues, or waiting lists, or uneven demand. For example, seats at popular movies or plays, demand for pretty much most goods right before Christmas, Super Bowl or World Series tickets, etc. In each of these cases, the same could be said of people on the demand side as of motorists during rush hour: they take into account their own waiting time, but not that they impose on others by their own participation in the queue. If this objection were with merit, therefore, and it barred road privatization, then all of these other goods and services would have to fall to government provision as well. But in this direction lies communism.

However, while it is indubitably true that this is indeed a problem of epic proportions on our nation’s roadways, it is far less so in any of these other situations. Why? Because in the market place, when there is a peak load demand, prices tend to rise. And when they do, this tends to mitigate the original problem. For example, tickets for the NBA or NHL playoffs are far higher than for ordinary games; prices are greater right before Christmas than right after, during January and Boxing Day sales. Movies and plays typically charge more for weekend evening shows than for matinees, or Tuesday nights. Thus, the uneven or peak load demand gets flattened out. In other words, deep within the bowels of the free enterprise system is the cure for this so called “market failure.” In other words, it is not a “market failure” at all, but one of government mismanagement.

The contrast with the public sector is a stark one indeed. Compare and contrast the reactions of public and private sellers during the Christmas rush. For-profit firms roll up their sleeves, hire extra workers, stock their shelves almost to the bursting point, and proudly announce they are open for business, ready and willing to help the consumers satisfy their demands. And what of statist counterparts? Take the post office as an example. They urge that people mail early, to avoid the Christmas rush! The customer is not “always right,” it would appear, in government “service.”

It is the same with roadway use. Do the street and highway managers charge more for use of these facilities during peak load times, which would have the result of ironing out the peaks and reducing congestion? To ask this question is to answer it: they do not. Rather, the same prices exist all throughout the week, namely, zero. Things are worse, far worse, with regard to bridges and tunnels also under the control of our road socialists. (6) Here, anti peak load pricing is engaged in? In other words, lower prices are charged during the hours of heaviest demand, thus exacerbating the problem. 

How does this come about?

Bridge and tunnel authorities commonly sell monthly passes at lower prices per trip than otherwise obtain. But precisely what kind of driver is likely to travel to the central business district 20-24 times per month? A suburban shopper? An out of towner? A rare visitor to the city? None of the above. Rather, obviously, the lion’s share of these tickets will be taken up by regular commuters, precisely the ones most likely to use them during morning rush hours into the city and afternoon ones out of it.

2.4. Road privatization is unfair to abutting property owners

It is impossible to predict precisely how a competitive market would function with regard to roads. If shoes were always and everywhere the province of government, and some rash individual were to advocate the end of footwear socialism and the implementation of private profit making firms in this industry, it might strain credulity. The objections would come thick and fast: how many shoe stores would be located on each block? Who would determine the color of the shoes? How would resources be allocated between boots, sneakers, runners, bedroom slippers, shower-thongs? What would be done to ensure a sufficient supply of shoelaces? Or, would there be loafers? Or would they be fastened with Velcro? Would the market provide high-heeled shoes for women? What about changing styles? Without government control, would profit seekers be able to accommodate alterations in taste, or, more ominously, would they impose their own aesthetic sensibilities on consumers? How, oh how, would the poor get shoes?

These difficulties present no particular problem. There is no movement afoot to nationalize the shoe industry. Were we to find ourselves in any such predicament, we would readily de nationalize, secure in the knowledge brought to us by years of reasonably satisfactory service from this quarter. Roads are different. Although at one time in our history turnpike companies provided these services to travelers, no one now alive has had any experience with them. (7) That alone goes some way toward explaining why, despite a large literature supporting roads (see footnote 2), regardless of the failure of the Soviet system that should awaken society to the benefits of privatization, we still suffer under government control of streets and highways. Moreover, difficult as are the problems of envisioning a fully free enterprise road system in operation, even more challenging are those of the transition period.

Take the problem of access as an example. One of the criticisms of free market roadways is that the homeowner or business firm will be “trapped” on its premises, if it is completely surrounded by four privately owned roads, as in the nature of things, it inevitably would be. In making the case for markets in this industry, it is easy to show that this “problem” is a straw man. For one thing, just as we now have title search when property changes hands, so under a system of free enterprise for streets, there would be “access search,” to ensure access and egress. For another, it would be in the financial interest of the road owner building a new facility to attract customers. Surely, he would fail dismally in this regard did he not ensure them of such basic amenities. (8)

But matters are far different when we contemplate not a private enterprise street and highway system de novo, but rather the transition period from our present road socialist institutions to one of pure laissez faire capitalism. For in this process, those in charge of the conversion will have to attempt to mimic the market, and, as we have established above with the shoe example, this cannot be done on the basis of economic theory alone. Rather, it is essentially an entrepreneurial task to establish how the shoe, the road, or, indeed, any other industry would function under a regime of economic freedom. But mimic the market they must, otherwise how else can the access and egress problem be addressed? If the roads are given to private firms, and no provision whatsoever is made for this phenomenon, this would be equivalent to giving these companies not only the streets themselves, but also everything abutting them. For, if they were given the roads with no strings attached, and could charge whatever they wished, they might set the tolls at a rate that the internal home and factory owners would be indifferent between keeping their property and relinquishing it. That is, the road owners, with the means at their disposal of blocking the internal property holders from access and egress, (9) would be able to capture, at least theoretically, the entire capital value of all these holdings. In order to obviate this possibility, those responsible for privatizing roads will have to mimic the street use charges that would have been imposed by a non existent private industry, in this contrary to fact conditional scenario.

Suppose, now, that somehow, this was accomplished. Still, our difficulties are not over. For a property owner abutting one of these avenues might say something along the following lines: “I don’t care a fig for the price you are allowing the road owner to charge me. I reject it, utterly. These tolls might seem fair to you, but not to me. Had I been confronted with them when I purchased my land, I never would have bought it.” (10) 

It cannot be denied that this is a powerful objection to the process of road privatization. We have not, after all, been able to offer a purely market process of transfer from the public to the private realm. Rather, we have been forced to use a bureaucratic process, wherein we non entrepreneurs have attempted to mimic the (non existent) market. And yet, and yet…. This objection seems too harsh by half. After all, it is not our fault that we cannot fully anticipate the market prices that would have eventuated, had the state never entered into this realm with its cloven feet. And even if we could, arguendo, any particular economic actor, such as the objector, could have legitimately rejected it. From one perspective, what we are trying to do is to unscramble the egg, and it cannot be done.

Rather than answering this particular objection, we will take refuge in the claim that all or at least virtually all privatization efforts are subject to it. Thus, there is nothing here in particular aimed at road privatization; it rather constitutes an objection to all such efforts.

In order to see this point, consider the privatization of a Russian nobleman’s castle. It might have been nationalized in 1917, and is given back sometime during the period 1989-2003. Is it the identical castle as existed in 1917? Of course, it is not. Is it even, to continue our analogy, the same castle as an imaginary one that would have existed, on the assumption that it was never nationalized in the first place? (11) It is difficult to answer this, to say the least. And, any answer we could give to the Russian nobleman (or his heirs) could be rejected by him (them) on similar grounds as those offered by our objector to road privatization. Namely, “well, this is the way you might have treated this castle in the intervening years, but it certainly isn’t the way I (we) would have managed it.”

But we need not resort to an example as esoteric as a castle. Any bit of farmland (or indeed, any other kind of land) will do. For it, too, will have or might have been treated differently than the manner that might have ensued had there been no initial land seizure. The person to whom we are now returning it will always be in a position to quibble with us; to assert that what he is being given back is not precisely what was taken away from him. He can say, no matter what additional amount is given him to compensate for this phenomenon, that it is unfair, that he would never have agreed to it. Merely the passage of time will always render this true. Therefore, we road privatizers need not worry about this objection any more than any other privatizer, of anything else other than roads.

Here is a second reply to the objection: (virtually) (12) any conversion to the market is better than allowing the status quo of road socialism. If we were to accept this objection as definitive, not only would there not be any road privatization, there would not be a return of any property from the public to the private sector. Ostensibly, the person making the objection is on the side of the angels. He can be, and we have so far, interpreted him as making this objection in behalf of the property owner abutting the road. However, this is also a more ominous interpretation that can be placed upon this objection. Objectively, at least, if it is taken seriously, it will spell the death knell of privatization efforts. Quo bono, from such an objection? Obviously, socialists. (13) 

A third rejoinder is as follows. Privatization, at least for our present purposes, may be likened to the just response to a crime. Someone (the government in our case) in effect stole something from the rightful owners (private roads, here, by either nationalizing private property and/or refusing to allow this industry to come into being in the first place). Naturally, in the case of crime, the emphasis should be on compensating the victim. (14) However, it is impossible to peer into the victim’s mind, to discern the contrary to fact conditional regarding how much he would have voluntarily accepted for what was in reality stolen from him had this nefarious deed not taken place. Given no interpersonal comparisons of utility, stipulate that there are no objective criteria for such losses, it is necessarily impossible that this problem be solved to the extent that the victim can never complain about the level of compensation given him.

3. Transitional problems

3.1. “Non-Compete” clauses to protect private investors 

Under contract with the government, private express toll lanes were built in the median of California’s State Route 91. The firm in question was guaranteed that this State would not later add to its capacity in competition with its own new facility. In other words, there was a “non compete” clause in the agreement, similar to that which exists in many private labor contracts. 

However, traffic increased in this area. As a result, Orange County exercised an option in this contract and bought out the SR-91 investors. This, in effect, renationalized the initially private Express Lanes, and allowed the State to build as more road capacity as it wished.

At the other end of the country, a similar initiative was dealt with in a very different way. Consider the private firm that built the “Dulles Greenway” toll road near Washington D.C. With no such stipulation in their contract the State of Virginia was not estopped (15) from building as much new capacity, in competition with this private roadway, as it wished. As a result, they added to their parallel Route 7, and economically undermined the private builder. 

One obvious comment is that private and public road capacity, serving side by side, is like trying to mix oil and water; it is unstable at best. It is rather difficult for an entrepreneur to continue to exist, let alone to prosper, when the government is giving away a very similar service for free. (16)

So, should the government sign contracts with private builders, offering “noncompete” clauses? To ask this is to answer it, at least from a libertarian (17) perspective. The government should absent itself from this industry, root and branch, immediately if not sooner. All roads should be commercialized at once; then, this problem would cease to exist.

Nor is this problem by any means confined to roads and streets. It exists, too, with regard to private bookstores being forced to compete against public libraries; for private gymnasiums faced with the competition from governmental playgrounds, parks, municipal swimming pools, etc. The state, here, plays the role of the ghoul, or the “undead,” in horror movies; short of killing it with a silver bullet, or with garlic, or whatever, the latter pair have an unfair advantage over humans, or entrepreneurs. They can be bankrupted, but their governmental sector counterparts cannot be. (18)

Suppose, now, that this happy scenario is not in the cards. That is, like it or not, governmental road systems will not disappear, at least not right away. Suppose we are confronted not with the question of whether the state should play any role whatsoever in highway management, with rather with the issue of given that it will for the foreseeable future continue to play a gigantic role in this regard, should it or should it not offer non compete clauses to the private establishments who add to roadway capacity?

This is by far a more difficult question to answer. We propose to do so under two very different headings: utilitarian and deontological.

The latter is easy. As a pure matter of justice, anything that supports private initiatives in this field is good. Non-compete clauses do so. QED.

The former is far more difficult. On the one hand, the worse shape statist roads are in, the higher the probability there is that they will be replaced by capitalist institutions. If so, then the last thing we want are non compete clauses, because this will strengthen the very few private road companies now allowed by the powers that be; this, in turn, will render the present situation more stable. Thus, paradoxically, supporting limited private enterprise in this manner will undermine placing roads totally under capitalism in the future. Worse is better, in this view of the world.

On the other hand, people now living need every bit of help they can get to rescue them from public road management. Non compete clauses will encourage private companies to take on some small percentage of the nation’s roadways, and this, at least, will help some few people who patronize them.

The difficulty is that we literally have no way of weighting these two considerations, so that an overall determination can be made. Suppose, for example, that non-compete clauses increased private road management so that it now made up 1% of the total (this is a vast overestimate, in terms of present mileage totals). Posit, further, that this would save x number of lives per year, and y amount of motorist’s time, but that it would put off, from 100 to 101 years, the date on which all roads would be privatized. Where is the interest rate, on the basis of which we could discount future time and lives saved, compared to present ones in this regard? There simply is no such thing. Therefore, it is impossible to definitively answer this question in any rational or objective manner. 

3.2. Pricing

How much should road users pay for roads, and how should they be charged? As we have seen with our shoe example, it is difficult to anticipate the market. Nevertheless, it is possible to discern some patterns in the midst of the fog, and to make predictions on the basis of them. 

There is little doubt that at least in the long run a private highway and street industry would utilize electronic road pricing (ERP). After all, universal product codes are now relied upon for a myriad of private goods; there is no reason to think that automobiles and trucks could not be similarly outfitted as is now done for bread and cough drops. However, the free enterprise philosophy would maintain that roadways should be privatized at whatever level of technology is presently available to a society; certainly, this quest should not have to wait until the development of ERP. 

Nor did it, historically. The earliest roads, we must never forget, were private turnpikes. Tollgates collected on the basis of the weight of the wagon, the number of axels, the number of horses and the width of the wheels. Thin-wheeled vehicles could go faster, but would create ruts in the road, and were therefore charged more. Thickwheeled ones would serve something of the function of a steam-roller, flattening out the road and making it more passable for others, and were thus charged less. In more recent history, places like Singapore used another low technology collection method. A bull’s eye would be superimposed on the city map, and a different color assigned to each of the areas thus created. The highest fees would be charged for use of those areas of the city in the center of the bull’s eye, with lower prices as the motorist was restricted, successively, to the more outlying areas. Strict penalties, needless to say, would be imposed on travelers found in areas not permitted by their color-coded permits. (19)

3.3. Should public roads be commercialized before being privatized?

That is, should the government be encouraged to institute electronic road pricing before the privatization process, or should we merely sit back and wait for private firms to do so once these facilities are under their control? 

One argument for immediate ERP is that the sooner it is done, the sooner we shall have economic rationality on the nation’s highways, and an end (or at least a vast diminution) of traffic congestion. Another is offered by Gabriel Roth: “One could keep the system of dedicated road funds and pay private owners out of such funds, in the same way that state roads are now financed. But there would have to be a mechanism for adjusting the road-use charges in accordance with the wishes of road users. All this would be easier if roads were commercialized before being privatized.” (20) 

But the arguments on the other side seem more powerful. For one thing, government roadway pricing (on bridges and tunnels) has already been tried, and it has been a dismal failure. Instead of engaging in peak load pricing, they have used anti peak load pricing, and have actually worsened the situation that would have otherwise obtained, not improved it. True, only some of this pricing has been electronic, more and more as the years go on, but this does not seem to be definitive. An institution that would misprice before the advent of ERP could be expected to do the same afterwards.

For another, let us suppose that, mirable dictu, the state actually priced correctly; i.e., charged more for rush hour than other traffic. We make the heroic assumption, here, that not only would they engage in some peak load pricing, but would actually be able to anticipate the market in this regard, all of this without benefit of any of capitalism’s weeding out process of profit and loss for business failures. Then, the problem would arise that in so doing, we will have functioned as efficiency experts for the state; we would have, counterproductively, managed to improve state operation.

Why is this “counterproductive”? Deontologically, because roadway management is simply not a legitimate role for the state, which should be, at least according to the philosophy of libertarianism, be confined to protection of persons and property through the provision of armies to keep foreign invaders from our shores, policies to quell local criminals, and courts to determine innocence or guilt. (21)  

But even on utilitarian grounds there are powerful arguments for not marginally improving state operation of roads. For if this is done, then the glorious day is put off even the more when government control ceases, and market forces once again take over this industry. For, make no mistake about it: public sector operation is responsible for an inordinate number of the tens of thousands of road fatalities which occur every year, and the sooner this can be stopped, the sooner this carnage will cease (or, at least be radically reduced.) (22)

So, which is better, purely on utilitarian grounds: a quick marginal improvement in roadway operation (23) coupled with putting off the glorious day of fully private control for an indefinitely long period of time, or, not attempting to be efficiency experts for the state, allowing them to wallow in their misbegotten management, and achieving full privatization earlier. Unfortunately, there is no discount rate, social or otherwise, on the basis of which a definitive judgment of this question can be made. Thus, the implications of a purely utilitarian analysis are unclear. Hence, we resort to deontology. 

Then, too, there is the argument that if government charges tolls on the road, even if it engages in peak load pricing, inevitably more money will flow into its coffers. However, contrary to Galbraith, (24) at least from a libertarian perspective, the state already has far too much money at its disposal, and the people far too little. Therefore, this would constitute an argument against peak load pricing on the part of the public sector.(25) True, the government could disburse these new funds back to the long-suffering tax paying public, whether directly or in the form of tax reductions. But this is as unlikely as Dave Barry becoming the next president of the United States by acclamation. 

3.4. Public relations

Right now, people are accustomed to street and highway use for “free.” How oh how will they ever be weaned away from this “entitlement” to which they have become accustomed? It will be appreciated that in a democracy, unless they are convinced to give up this privilege, there is little hope for ultimate privatization. 

One approach is to reject this question as improper, even impertinent. After all, we are after the truth, here, with a capital “T” and if the masses are too moronic to see the benefits of privatization, well, they deserve to be killed like flies on the public highways, and to suffer the “slings and arrows of outrageous” traffic congestion. But let us take a more sober tack. There is, after all, specialization and a division of labor in all things, and our present concerns are no exception to this rule. The average motorist can be forgiven for not reflecting carefully on something which, in the very nature of things, is out of his purview.

One tack in our public relations efforts might be to support such private road initiatives as California’s State Route 91 and the “Dulles Greenway,” at either ends of our country. The advantage, here, is that there was no history of free access in either case; so it is not likely, or at least it is less so, that resentment will build up at having to pay for that which was hitherto enjoyed “for free.” If enough of these roadways are built, then, perhaps, eventually, the motoring public will come to see the benefits of this institution. 

A better approach might be to convey to the public that even if it could enjoy public provision of highways and streets “for free” and had to pay for private counterparts, it might still be worth it to do so, given that the latter option would be vastly preferable in terms of safety and congestion concerns.

Better yet might be to point out to the typical motorist that he by no means enjoys public roadway services “for free.” Rather, that he pays for them, in the form of a myriad of taxes, both direct and indirect. Somehow, the term “freeways” indicates to him that he pays nothing for them. Although originally conceived as a characterization of the fact that highways were of limited access, without traffic lights, and thus that travelers could move “freely,” this phrase now functions to indicate to people that they pay nothing for them. Nothing could be further from the truth. And, given the general rule of thumb that private services come at a fraction of the cost of their public counterparts, it would be a shock to learn that this would not apply to the present situation. Thus, it is almost a given that the explicit costs of highway provision likely to be passed on to the consumer by a private industry would be a small part of those now imposed upon him, implicitly, in the form of hidden and not so hidden taxes. 

Notes

(1) Beito, David T., “From Privies to Boulevards: The Private Supply of Infrastructure in the United States during the Ninteenth Century,” in Jerry Jenkins and David E. Sisk, eds., Development by Consent: The Voluntary Supply of Public Goods and Services (San Francisco, 1993): 23-48; Beito, David T. and Linda Royster Beito, “Rival Road Builders: Private Toll Roads in Nevada, 1852-1880,” Nevada Historical Society Quarterly 41 (Summer 1998), 71-91; Beito, David T. “Voluntary Association and the Life of the City,” Humane Studies Review, Fall 1988; Beito, David T. “Owning the Commanding Heights,” Essays in Public Works History, vol. 16, 1989; Block, Walter, “Free Market Transportation: Denationalizing the Roads,” Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. III, No. 2, Summer 1979, pp. 209-238; Block, Walter, “Congestion and Road Pricing,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. IV, No. 3, Fall 1980, pp. 299-330; Block, Walter, “Public Goods and Externalities: The Case of Roads,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. VII, No. 1, Spring 1983, pp. 1-34; Block, Walter, “Theories of Highway Safety,” Transportation Research Record, #912, 1983, pp. 7-10; Block, Walter “Road Socialism,” International Journal of Value-Based Management, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 195-207; Block, Walter and Block, Matthew, “Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property Rights,” Journal Des Economistes Et Des Etudes Humanes, Vol. VII, No. 2/3, June-September 1996, pp. 351-362; Block, Walter, “Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property: Reply to Gordon Tullock,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 8, No. 2/3, June-September 1998, pp. 315-326; Block, Walter, “Private Roads, Competition, Automobile Insurance and Price Controls,” Competitiveness Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1998, pp. 55- 64; Block, Walter, “Transition to private roads,” unpublished ms.; Block, Walter, “Road Privatization: Rejoinder to Mohring,” unpublished ms.; Foldvary, Fred, Public Goods and Private Communities: The Market Provision of Social Services (Edward Elgar, 1994); Cadin, Michelle, and Block, Walter, (1997), “Privatize the Public Highway System,” The Freeman, February, Vol. 47, No. 2., pp. 96-97; Caplan, Bryan. 1996. A Practical Proposal for Privatizing the Highways and Other “Natural” Monopolies. Economic Notes 72. Libertarian Alliance, London; Cobin, John, M. (1999), Market Provisions of Highways: Lessons from Costanera Norte. Planning and Markets, Volume 2, Number 1; De Palma, Andre and Robin Lindsey, “Private toll roads: Competition under various ownership regimes,” The Annals of Regional Science, 2000, Vol. 34, pp. 13-35; De Palma, Andre and Robin Lindsey, “A Model of Curb Rights In Private Urban Transit Markets,” Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference, 2001, pp. 581-596; Klein, Dan, “The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods? The Turnpike Companies of Early America,” Economic Inquiry, October 1990, pp. 788-812; Klein, Dan, Majewski, J., and Baer, C., “Economy, Community and the Law: The Turnpike Movement in New York, 1797-1845, The Journal of Economic History, March 1993, pp. 106-122; Klein, Dan, Majewski, J., and Baer, C., “From Trunk to Branch: Toll Roads in New York, 1800-1860,” Essays in Economic and Business History, 1993, pp. 191-209; Klein, Dan and Fielding, G.J., “Private Toll Roads: Learning from the Nineteenth Century,” Transportation Quarterly, July 1992, pp. 321-341; Klein, Dan and Fielding, G.J., “How to Franchise Highways,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, May 1993, pp. 113-130; Klein, Dan and Fielding, G.J., “High Occupancy/Toll Lanes: Phasing in Congestion Pricing a Lane at a Time,” Policy Study, No. 170, Reason Foundation, November 1993; Lemennicier, Bertrand, “La Privatisation des rues,” Journal Des Economistes Et Des Etudes Humaines, Vol. VII, No. 2/3, June-September 1996, pp 363-376; Roth, Gabriel, Paying for Roads: The Economics of Traffic Congestion, Middlesex, England: Penguin, 1967; Roth, Gabriel, The Private Provision of Public Services in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987; Roth, Gabriel, A Self-financing Road System, London, England, The Insitute of Economic Affairs, 1966; Semmens, John, “Road to Ruin,” The Freeman (December, 1981); Semmens, John, “The Privatization of Highway Facilities,” Transportation Research Forum, (November, 1983); Semmens, John, “Highways: Public Problems and Private Solutions,” The Freeman (March, 1985); Semmens, John, “Intraurban Road Privatization,” Transportation Research Record 1107 (1987); Semmens, John, “Using Competition to Break the U.S. Road Monopoly,” Heritage Foundation (December 14, 1987); Semmens, John, “Privatization: Saving While Serving the Public,” Goldwater Institute (April 25, 1988); Semmens, John, “Taking Over the Roads,” Liberty (November 1988); Semmens, John, “Why We Need Highway Privatization,” Laissez Faire Institute (March 1991); Semmens, John, “Private Highways? They’re Cheaper, Better, Fairer,” Phoenix Gazette (April 3, 1991); Semmens, John, “The Rationale for Toll Roads: You Get What You Pay For” Phoenix Gazette (December 16, 1992); Semmens, John, “Highway Privatization: What Are the Benefits for Arizona?,” Goldwater Institute (December 1992); Semmens, John, “From Highways to Buy-Ways,” Spectrum (Fall 1993); Semmens, John, “How to Solve Mandatory Auto Insurance,” Goldwater Institute (July 1995); Semmens, John, “Highway Investment Analysis,” Arizona Department of Transportation (December 1994); Semmens, John, “Privatize Driver’s License, Registration System,” Tribune (December 25, 1994); Semmens, John, “Privatizing Vehicle Registrations, Driver’s Licenses and Auto Insurance,” Transportation Quarterly (Fall 1995); Semmens, John, “Selling the Roads: Privatizing Transportation Systems,” Liberty (1996); Semmens, John, “Goodbye, DMV,” Liberty (January 1996).

(2) Block, Walter, “Road Socialism,” International Journal of Value-Based Management, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 195-207. 

(3) This process is called “expropriation” in Canada. 

(4) For a debate concerning these phenomena, see Block, Walter and Block, Matthew, “Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property Rights,” Journal Des Economistes Et Des Etudes Humaines, Vol. VII, No. 2/3, June-September 1996, pp. 351-362; Tullock, Gordon, “Comment on Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property, by Walter Block and Matthew Block, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. , No. , 1998, pp. zx. Block, Walter, “Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property: Reply to Gordon Tullock,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 8, No. 2/3, June-September 1998, pp. 315-326. The first and third of these articles make the point that in bridging over, or tunneling under, someone’s property, the latter’s land ownership rights need not be abridged.

(5) For the argument that monopsony is not a market failure, see Block, Walter and William Barnett, “An Austrian Critique of Neo-Classical Monopoly and Monopsony Theory,” unpublished ms; For the argument that monopoly does not constitute a market failure, see Armentano, Dominick T., Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure, New York: Wiley, 1982; Armentano, Dominick T., The Myths of Antitrust, New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House, 1972; Armstrong, Don, Competition vs. Monopoly, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, 1982; Rothbard, Murray N., Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. (2 volumes.) Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co., 1962.

(6) Block, Walter, “Road Socialism,” International Journal of Value-Based Management, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 195-207.

(7) Recently, there have been several quasi-private road firms in operation. But these are all under the control of the public authorities, and thus do not constitute a pure form of private enterprise street and highway firms. 

(8) For more on this see Block, Walter, “Free Market Transportation: Denationalizing the Roads,” Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. III, No. 2, Summer 1979, pp. 209-238.

(9) In making this statement, we implicitly assume away the possibility of using helicopters, and long pole-vaulting sticks, building bridges over, or tunnels under, these streets, in order to overcome the roadblocks. See also ft. 4, supra. 

(10) I am indebted to my Loyola University New Orleans colleague Professor William Barnett II for posing this objection to me. 

(11) We are now entering, with a vengeance, the arena of contrary to fact alternative science fiction history.

(12) Rothbard, Murray N., The Ethics of Liberty, New York: New York University Press, 1998 (1982), p. 54 mentions one such: a king, right before dissolving his unjust government “arbitrarily parcels out the entire land areas of his kingdom to the ‘ownership’ of himself and his relatives.” I owe this cite to Laurent Carnis and Andre Andrade.

(13) Strictly speaking, there are two kinds of socialists; those who advocate this position on a voluntary basis (the nunnery, the monastery, the kibbutz that receives no levies based on coercion; even the typical family is organized on the basis of “from each to his ability, to each according to his need.”) or coercively, e.g., state socialism. Needless to say, we are now alluding to the latter of these two meanings. (14) This, at least, is the libertarian take on the issue. For more on this see Rothbard, The Ethics of Liberty, Evers, Williamson, Victim’s Rights, Restitution and Retribution, Oakland, CA: Independent Institute, 1996, p. 25; Kinsella, Stephan N., “Punishment and Proportionality: The Estoppel Approach,” 12:1 J. Libertarian Studies 51 (Spring 1996).

(15) See Kinsella, “Punishment and Proportionality”.

(16) Obviously, the government does not provide highways and streets for free. They are, rather, financed through various and sundry tax levies. But the point is that at the time of decision as to which roadway to patronize, the motorist faces an additional fee for the private alternative, that does not exist for the public one.

(17) Block, Walter, Defending the Undefendable, New York: Fox and Wilkes, 1985; Block, Walter, “Libertarianism vs. Libertinism,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1994, pp. 117-128; Cuzán, Alfred G., “Do We Ever Really Get Out of Anarchy?,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 151-158 (Summer, 1979); De Jasay, Anthony, The State, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985; Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism: Economics, Politics and Ethics, Boston: Kluwer, 1989; Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, Boston: Kluwer, 1993; Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, “The Private Production of Defense,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter 1998-1999, pp. 27-52; Kinsella, Stephan, “New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory,” 12:2 Journal of Libertarian Studies 313-26 (Fall 1996); Oppenheimer, Franz, The State, New York: Free Life Editions, (1914), 1975; Rothbard, Murray N., For a New Liberty, Macmillan, New York, 1978; Rothbard, Murray N., The Ethics of Liberty, Stringham, Edward, “Justice Without Government,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter 1998-1999, pp. 53-77; Tinsley, Patrick, “With Liberty and Justice for All: A Case for Private Police,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter 1998-1999, pp. 95-100.

(18) In the short run, in any case. In the long run, there is of course for public enterprise in otherwise capitalist nations the fate that overtook the Soviet economy.

(19) See on this Block, Walter, “Free Market Transportation: Denationalizing the Roads,” Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. III, No. 2, summer 1979, pp. 209-238.

(20) Unpublished letter to the present author, dated 12/20/02.

(21) The anarcho capitalist version of libertarianism, of course, would restrict the government to a far greater, indeed, total, extent.

(22) See on this Block, Walter, “Road Privatization: Rejoinder to Mohring,” unpublished ms.; Block, Walter, “Theories of Highway Safety,” Transportation Research Record, #912, 1983, pp. 7-10.

(23) Remember, we are still implicitly making the heroic assumption that government will get things right, road pricing wise, something neither they, nor their soviet planning counterparts, ever succeeded in doing.

(24) Galbraith, John Kenneth, The Affluent Society, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1958. 

(25) It is sometimes argued that one of the benefits of legalizing addictive drugs is that they could then be taxed, and the government revenues enhanced. From this perspective, this would be the only valid case against legalization.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Walter Block

Walter Block

Walter Block is the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at Loyola University, senior fellow of the Mises Institute, and regular columnist for LewRockwell.com.

This Post Has 149 Comments

  1. I for all time emailed this webpage post page to all my contacts, since if like
    to read it then my links will too.

  2. This ɑrticle presents clear idea dеsigned for the new viewers of blogging, that realⅼy how to
    Ԁoо ruynning a blog.

  3. Hi there to every single one, it’s in fact a pleasant for me
    to pay a quick visit this website, it includes precious Information.

  4. Heya i am for the primary time here. I found this board and I to
    find It really useful & it helped me out much. I am hoping to offer something again and
    help others like you helped me.

  5. Thank you for sharing superb informations. Your web-site is
    very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this site.

    It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles.
    You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the information I
    already searched everywhere and just could
    not come across. What a great site.

    My web-site :: MaxExtend

  6. I’m not sure exactly why but this web site is loading very slow for me.

    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my
    end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

    Also visit my web-site: Muama Ryoko Portable Wifi

  7. Hello to every body, it’s my first pay a quick visit of this blog; this web site includes awesome and genuinely excellent data in favor of visitors.

    my web site: Hermine

  8. I am only commenting to let you be aware of of the incredible discovery my cousin’s daughter went through going through your
    site. She mastered some pieces, which include how it is like to have an amazing helping mindset to
    let the mediocre ones really easily learn a variety of impossible subject areas.
    You truly surpassed visitors’ expectations.
    Thanks for displaying the great, safe, revealing and even unique thoughts
    on that topic to Emily.

    Stop by my web page :: Bodycor Keto

  9. I enjoy what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and exposure!
    Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated
    you guys to my blogroll.

    Take a look at my webpage … mpc-install.com

  10. Whoah this weblog is excellent i like studying your articles.
    Stay up the great work! You know, many persons are searching
    round for this info, you can aid them greatly.

    Feel free to surf to my blog: http://www.atomy123.com

  11. Needed to draft you the little bit of word so as to thank you very
    much once again for those lovely views you have shared at this time.
    This is really strangely open-handed of people like you giving extensively
    exactly what some people would’ve distributed for an ebook to help make some bucks on their own, notably considering that you might well have
    done it if you wanted. These tactics also worked like the good way
    to realize that the rest have the same eagerness like mine to know a little more in terms
    of this problem. I believe there are thousands of more pleasant
    occasions up front for people who view your site.

    My site; duna-anapa.net.ru

  12. Hi there very cool web site!! Man .. Excellent ..
    Wonderful .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally…I am
    satisfied to search out so many helpful info right here within the submit, we
    need develop more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing.

    Also visit my web page: Dentitox Pro Review

  13. Excellent post. I used to be checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Extremely helpful information specially the remaining section 🙂 I take care of such info much.
    I was looking for this certain info for a long time. Thank
    you and best of luck.

    Feel free to visit my web page – Essential Nutrition Performance

  14. Great blog here! Additionally your web site rather a lot up
    very fast! What host are you the use of? Can I get your affiliate link for
    your host? I desire my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

    Feel free to visit my web-site: http://www.craksracing.com

  15. If you are going for best contents like I do, just pay a visit this web page daily since
    it presents feature contents, thanks

  16. Hey there, I think your website might be having browser compatibility
    issues. When I look at your blog site in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that,
    excellent blog!

  17. I visited several blogs but the audio feature for audio songs current at this site is truly excellent.

    Here is my site – joker123 download apk joker123 android (xe88sg.com)

  18. Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for info about this subject for
    ages and yours is the best I have found out so far.

    However, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you sure concerning the source?

  19. Hey there I am so glad I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was looking on Google for something else, Nonetheless I am here now
    and would just like to say thank you for a tremendous post and a all
    round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to go through it all at the moment but I have
    bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I
    have time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up
    the great job.

    my web-site; MaxExtend

  20. Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!
    Appreciate it

    My web page Crypto Bank App Website (webboard.thaibaccarat.net)

  21. Saya akan segera rebut rss Anda karena saya tidak bisa
    Ahaa, ini rewel diskusi tentang artikel di sini di halaman web ini, saya sudah membaca semua itu, jadi saat ini saya juga berkomentar di sini .

    Take a look at my blog post Joker123 casino download pc (joker123slots.com)

  22. Helpful information. Lucky me I found your web site unintentionally, and I am stunned why
    this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

    Here is my blog post king855 11 – mega888sg.com,

  23. Wow, superb weblog layout! How lengthy have you been running a blog for?
    you make running a blog glance easy. The full look of your website is great, let
    alone the content!

    my web page; mega88 download

  24. Thank you for the good writeup. It if truth be told used
    to be a enjoyment account it. Glance complicated to
    far delivered agreeable from you! However,
    how could we be in contact?

  25. This post will help the internet visitors for setting up new web site or even a weblog from start to
    end.

    My web page – calibet test id (918kiss-m.com)

  26. Yesterday, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad and tested to see if it can survive a 30 foot drop,
    just so she can be a youtube sensation. My
    iPad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it
    with someone!

    My website … slot casino online malaysia

  27. Wonderful blog you have here but I was wondering if you knew
    of any community forums that cover the same topics
    talked about here? I’d really like to be a part of online community where I can get feedback from other knowledgeable people that share
    the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me
    know. Appreciate it!

    Check out my web site; Lion House Keto Pills

  28. You really make it appear so easy together with your presentation but I in finding this topic to
    be really one thing that I feel I would never understand.

    It kind of feels too complex and very huge for me. I am having a look forward to your next put up, I will try to get the hold of it!

    Look at my site … Bellissi Ageless Moisturizer Review

  29. Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if
    you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you prevent it,
    any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so
    much lately it’s driving me crazy so any assistance is very much appreciated.

    my web-site ace333 game

  30. Because the admin of this web site is working, no hesitation very shortly it will be famous, due to its quality contents.

    Feel free to surf to my homepage 888 casino malaysia (https://bgoldbet.com/)

  31. Hola! I’ve been following your blog for a while now and finally got the
    bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Austin Texas!

    Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!

  32. hello there and thank you for your info ? I have certainly picked up something new from right here.

    I did however expertise some technical points using this site, since I experienced to reload the website many times previous to I could get it to load
    properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting
    is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will
    very frequently affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score
    if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective interesting content.
    Ensure that you update this again very soon..

    My blog … Quit Smoking Gummies – http://www.guaji333.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=808136&do=profile&from=space

  33. Saved as a favorite, I love your website!

    Here is my web blog; download slot game sky1388 (Mason)

  34. I read this article completely on the topic of the difference of latest and previous technologies, it’s amazing
    article.

    Here is my page; test Id Lpe88

  35. Great blog right here! Also your site quite a bit up very fast!
    What web host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink on your host?
    I want my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

    My web site; game online wukong333

  36. I visited various web pages but the audio quality
    for audio songs present at this web page is truly marvelous.

    my webpage: download slot game love138 (sg918kiss.com)

  37. Hi there, I found your site by means of Google even as searching for a comparable subject, your site got here up, it
    seems to be great. I have bookmarked it in my google
    bookmarks.
    Hi there, just changed into aware of your weblog via Google,
    and found that it’s really informative. I’m going to be careful for
    brussels. I will appreciate in the event you proceed this in future.
    Lots of other folks will probably be benefited
    from your writing. Cheers!

    Also visit my web site … free download game love138; xe88-app.com,

  38. I almost never comment, but i did some searching and wound up here Overcoming difficulties
    in privatizing roads – Walter E. Block. And I actually do have a couple of questions for you if it’s allright.
    Could it be only me or does it look like some of these responses come across like coming from brain dead individuals?
    😛 And, if you are posting on additional online sites, I’d like to keep up
    with anything New Flow XL Reviews you have to post.
    Would you list of all of your community pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or
    twitter feed?

  39. We stumbled over here by a different page and
    thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see
    so now i am following you. Look forward to exploring your web page yet again.

  40. It is the best time to make a few plans for the
    longer term and it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this post and if I may just I wish to counsel you few interesting things or advice.
    Perhaps you can write subsequent articles relating to this article.
    I want to read even more things approximately it!

  41. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this fantastic blog!
    I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed
    to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and
    will share this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  42. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is valuable and all.
    But think of if you added some great visuals or video
    clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images
    and video clips, this site could certainly be one of
    the very best in its niche. Amazing blog!

    Also visit my website kiosk sky777 vip (https://918kiss-m.com/sky777)

  43. My spouse and I stumbled over here different page and thought I may as well check things out.

    I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to checking out your web
    page repeatedly.

    Feel free to surf to my page :: Skyline X Drone Video

  44. Hello there, I think your web site could be having internet browser compatibility problems.
    When I look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening
    in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Besides that, fantastic website!

  45. Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site.

    I stumbledupon it 😉 I’m going to come back yet again since i have book-marked it.
    Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you
    be rich and continue to help others.

  46. I like the helpful information you provide in your articles.
    I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here
    regularly. I’m quite certain I’ll learn a lot of new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!

    Here is my webpage: Pure Form Keto Pills

  47. Excellent post. I used to be checking constantly this weblog and I am inspired!
    Very useful information particularly the closing phase 🙂 I handle such info a lot.
    I used to be seeking this certain info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

    Here is my web page – http://gw2.jeff6o6.com

  48. I don’t even understand how I ended up right here, but I thought this publish was good.

    I do not know who you might be but definitely you are going to a well-known blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

    my web blog :: Alpha Hotrod

  49. Hi! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group?

    There’s a lot of people that I think would really enjoy your content.
    Please let me know. Thank you

    my site … CBD Flow

  50. I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or weblog
    posts on this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this site.
    Reading this info So i’m happy to express that I have an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed.

    I so much for sure will make sure to do not fail to remember this web site and give it a look on a constant basis.

    My page … Breeze Box AC

  51. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement?
    My blog has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of
    it is popping it up all over the web without
    my agreement. Do you know any solutions to help reduce content from being ripped off?
    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

    my web page … Nutrition Hacks Keto Hack

  52. Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this information. Nowadays bloggers
    publish just about gossips and internet and this
    is really frustrating. A good site with interesting content, that is what I need.

    Thanks for keeping this web-site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters?

    Cant find it.

    Here is my web blog InstaFrost Air Conditioner Reviews

  53. I was extremely pleased to uncover this web site.
    I wanted to thank you for your time due to this wonderful read!!
    I definitely enjoyed every bit of it and I have you
    bookmarked to look at new stuff in your website.

    My web blog: CBD Flow Review

  54. Greetings from Colorado! I’m bored at work so I decided
    to browse your site on my iphone during lunch break.
    I really like the information you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G ..
    Anyhow, excellent site!

    my web site :: Keto Hack Reviews

  55. Hello my family member! I want to say that this post is awesome, nice written and come with approximately all significant
    infos. I’d like to look extra posts like this.

    Also visit my web page … showhorsegallery.com

  56. Greate post. Keep posting such kind of information on your
    site. Im really impressed by your site.[X-N-E-W-L-I-N-S-P-I-N-X]Hi there, You have done
    an incredible job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends.
    I am confident they’ll be benefited from this
    web site.

    Also visit my website: TechPro Wifi

  57. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative.
    I?m gonna watch out for brussels. I will be
    grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of
    people will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

    My website – Christie

  58. Aw, this was a very nice post. Taking a few minutes and
    actual effort to generate a top notch article? but what can I
    say? I put things off a lot and never seem to get nearly
    anything done.

    Here is my web site … IceHouse Portable AC

  59. I don’t even understand how I stopped up right here, however I believed this post was once great.
    I don’t recognise who you’re but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger when you are not already
    😉 Cheers!

    Feel free to visit my blog post; Ice House Portable AC Review

  60. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking
    more of your wonderful post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

    Feel free to visit my blog post; Leaf Max CBD Oil

  61. Hi there, You have done an excellent job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends.
    I am sure they will be benefited from this web site.

    my site … Spark Aura Serum

  62. Thank you for some other great post. Where else may anybody get
    that type of information in such a perfect manner of writing?
    I have a presentation subsequent week, and I’m on the look for such information.

  63. It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I’ve read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or advice.
    Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read even more things about it!

    Here is my web blog: Cleaner Smile Teeth Whitening Review

  64. Hi! I’ve been reading your website for a long time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Dallas Tx!

    Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent job!

    Visit my homepage – Re ViVium

  65. A fascinating discussion is definitely worth
    comment. I think that you should publish more on this subject
    matter, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people don’t talk about such issues.
    To the next! Many thanks!!

    Also visit my web page – EcoHack Fuel Saver Reviews

  66. Heya i’m for the primary time here. I found this board and I in finding It really helpful & it helped me out much.
    I am hoping to give something back and aid others like you helped me.

  67. Simply want to say your article is as surprising. The
    clearness in your post is just nice and i can assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Fine with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to
    date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please
    carry on the rewarding work.

    My website: bbs.hanmu.net.cn

  68. Hello.This article was extremely motivating, especially because I was investigating for
    thoughts on this issue last Sunday.

    My web page – http://www.koan.at

  69. Hello my friend! I wish to say that this article is awesome, great written and include almost all important infos.
    I would like to look extra posts like this .

  70. I’m not sure why but this weblog is loading very slow for
    me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a issue on my end?
    I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  71. Of course, what a splendid blog and enlightening posts, I will bookmark
    your website.Have an awsome day!

    My web blog – Vigalix Pills

  72. Nice respond in return of this difficulty with firm arguments and telling the whole
    thing about that.

    my blog post … aniene.net

  73. My brother recommended I would possibly like this blog.
    He was once totally right. This submit truly
    made my day. You can not consider just how so much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  74. Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you
    get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you protect against it, any
    plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

  75. I do not know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else encountering problems
    with your site. It appears as though some of the written text
    within your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to
    them as well? This may be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen before.
    Thank you

  76. You’ve made some really good points there. I looked on the web for more info about the issue and found most people will go
    along with your views on this website.

  77. I read this piece of writing fully concerning the difference of newest and earlier technologies,
    it’s awesome article.

  78. I gotta favorite this web site it seems extremely helpful invaluable.

    my page – Barb

  79. I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s to
    be precisely what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content
    to suit your needs? I wouldn’t mind producing a post or elaborating on most of the subjects
    you write with regards to here. Again, awesome web site!

  80. These are actually enormous ideas in on the topic of blogging.
    You have touched some fastidious factors here.
    Any way keep up wrinting.

  81. I enjoy looking through a post that will make men and women think.

    Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!

  82. fantastic issues altogether, you just won a new reader.
    What might you recommend in regards to your post that you made
    a few days ago? Any positive?

    Here is my homepage … Keto Expert Reviews

  83. My partner and i still can not quite think I could always be one of those studying the important recommendations found on your website.
    My family and I are sincerely thankful for your generosity and for presenting me the
    potential to pursue my own chosen profession path. Appreciate your sharing the important information I managed to get from your website.

    My webpage; http://www.mi77b.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=405093&do=profile&from=space

  84. Very good post! We are linking to this particularly great article on our website.
    Keep up the great writing.

    Stop by my web page :: Ignite CBD Oil

  85. Asking questions are genuinely pleasant thing if
    you are not understanding anything fully, however this
    paragraph presents pleasant understanding yet. quest bars http://bitly.com/3C2tkMR quest bars

  86. Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your post is just nice and
    i can assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Fine with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post.

    Thanks a million and please continue the rewarding work.
    asmr https://app.gumroad.com/asmr2021/p/best-asmr-online asmr

  87. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to
    my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates.

    I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite
    some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this.
    Please let me know if you run into anything.
    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.
    cheap flights http://1704milesapart.tumblr.com/ cheap flights

  88. Asking questions are really pleasant thing if you are not understanding anything completely,
    however this article provides nice understanding yet. scoliosis
    surgery https://0401mm.tumblr.com/ scoliosis surgery

  89. Good day I am so happy I found your blog page, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Google for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just
    like to say thanks a lot for a marvelous post and a
    all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it
    and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a
    lot more, Please do keep up the awesome work. quest bars https://www.iherb.com/search?kw=quest%20bars quest bars

  90. You can definitely see your skills in the work you write.
    The arena hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe.

    All the time follow your heart.

    Check out my blog; protein diet

  91. It’s going to be ending of mine day, except before ending I am reading this fantastic article to improve my experience.

    My web-site raw foods

  92. We would like to thank you all over again for the beautiful ideas
    you gave Jesse when preparing her own post-graduate research in addition to,
    most importantly, for providing the many ideas within a blog
    post. In case we had known of your website a year ago, we’d have been rescued from the needless measures we were selecting.
    Thank you very much.

    Feel free to surf to my blog post … casualvalueinvestor.com

  93. Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with Search
    Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted
    keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share.

    Appreciate it!

    Also visit my homepage … low-carb diet

  94. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems
    of plagorism or copyright violation? My website
    has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either created myself
    or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping
    it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any methods to help prevent content from being stolen?
    I’d truly appreciate it.

    My homepage extreme weight loss diet

  95. I think this is among the most significant information for me.
    And i’m happy studying your article. However wanna commentary
    on some general issues, The site taste is ideal, the articles is actually
    nice : D. Just right job, cheers

    Here is my website; eczema remedies

  96. You’re so cool! I don’t think I’ve read a single
    thing like that before. So great to find another person with
    a few original thoughts on this subject matter. Seriously..
    many thanks for starting this up. This website is something that’s needed on the web, someone with some originality!

    Check out my page – daily acne skin care routine

  97. I am genuinely pleased to glance at this website posts which
    consists of lots of helpful information, thanks for providing these kinds of information.

    Here is my webpage; email marketing

  98. I just like the helpful information you supply for your
    articles. I’ll bookmark your blog and check again right here regularly.

    I am reasonably sure I will learn many new stuff right
    right here! Best of luck for the next!

    My page skin protection

  99. I used to be suggested this website by my cousin. I’m now not sure whether this post is
    written by means of him as no one else know such precise
    about my problem. You’re wonderful! Thanks!

    Here is my page – 163.30.42.16

  100. I don’t even know how I stopped up right here, but I believed
    this put up was once good. I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger in case you
    are not already. Cheers!

    Also visit my page; routine skin care

  101. I have been surfing on-line greater than 3 hours today,
    yet I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.
    It is beautiful value enough for me. Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made excellent content as you did,
    the internet shall be a lot more helpful than ever before.

    Here is my web-site :: cannabis license maybe

  102. Appreciate it for all your efforts that you
    have put in this. Very interesting information.

    Feel free to surf to my blog post – drug addiction

  103. I am really impressed with your writing skills and also
    with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid
    theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the
    excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog
    like this one today.

Leave a Reply