Climate science research is rigged: but what about economics?

Walter Block
Loyola University New Orleans
Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business
wblock@loyno.edu

Climate science research is rigged: but what about economics?

ABSTRACT

Recent discoveries have revealed that there is intellectual bias in the field of climate science; the present paper makes the case that this moral and intellectual rot has also affected the field of economics.

I. Introduction 

It is by now clear to everyone that all is not well in the field of climate science. Recent events have demonstrated that when it comes to scientific open mindedness (Gold, 1989), buttressed by double blind refereeing and peer review, something is rotten in the state of temperature measurement. (1) No longer can we take claims from mainstream climatologists to the effect that we are now experiencing man made global warming, without buckets and buckets of salt. Skeptics and “deniers” have now been given a shot in the arm because of this disgraceful intellectual hanky-panky. (2)

What about economics? Particularly, I ask, has the Austro-libertarian movement been victimized by similar shenanigans? Although there is no similar “smoking gun,” there would appear to be at least some prima facie evidence in support of this contention: we are now suffering in the midst of economic doldrums. Opinions differ as to whether we are in the throes of merely a serious recession or the second coming of the Great Depression, but, whatever the situation, it is clear that none of the main stream schools of economic thought − Keynesian, neoclassical, monetarist, New Classical/rational expectations, New Keynesian, Real Business Cycles, Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium − have a clue as to the genesis of this misery, nor what to do about solving the problem. And yet, the Austrians, the only ones to whom such a negative assessment does not apply, have been all but frozen out of the public discussion (3) by the mainstream media. The Austrian or praxeological school is, as it were, the economic equivalent of “deniers” or skeptics.

Why is this?

There are two prominent viewpoints within the Austro-libertarian movement that attempt to explain this sad state of affairs. The first, mainly associated with initially with Israel Kirzner, and, now, also, with Peter Boettke, is that we have tried our best, but, with a few exceptions, we have been found wanting. We the followers of Menger, Mises and Hayek must simply do better work if our analysis is to be accepted by the scholarly community. We must show them that our insights help explain economic reality, and we have usually fallen down on the job. But the gatekeepers of the profession, editors and referees of the prestigious publications, and members of the economics departments at the top schools such as Harvard, MIT, Columbia, NYU, Chicago, Berkeley, Stanford, etc., are open minded. When and if we do get our act together, our colleague economists representing other schools of thought will judge our output fairly, and accept it if it is good.

The alternative explanation was propounded by Murray Rothbard when he created the Review of Austrian Economics (the successor journal is now the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics). The editor of the latter, Joseph Salerno, is now perhaps the most prominent articulator of this critical viewpoint. (4) The perspective that arises from this quarter is that there is chicanery afoot; prestige in the economics profession is based on publication in the leading journals, such as the American Economic Review, the Journal of Political Economy, and others of that ilk. But the editors and referees of those journals see Austrianism as a cult, or a religion, and with but very few exceptions refuse to publish the findings of members of this school of economic thought. The Rothbard founded the RAE because of this very fact: Austrians were all but barred from mainstream “prestigious” journals. (5)

There is some evidence in support of the optimistic hypothesis. There are, after all, a few Austrians who have managed to publish in the top journals. (6)  However, several of them are merely short notes, or replies, not full length articles (Garrison, 1985; Kirzner, 1963; Rothbard, 1951a, 1951b). One of them appeared in Papers and Proceedings, not in the “main” section of the journal (Anderson and Hill, 1967). Some of them are Austrians only if a rather inclusive definition of this term is employed (Heiner, 1983; Frech, 1976). Some of these were written by Austrians, but the article in question had nothing to do with this school of thought, and could have been written by a (very gifted) neoclassical economist (Leeson, 2007). (7)  Some of them are criticisms of other Austrian economists (Cowen (8)  and Fink, 1985), something to which the mainstream, according to this critical hypothesis, would not be adverse. (9)  One is struck by the paucity of the number of such publications, since there have been dozens, scores, maybe even hundreds of Austrians actively publishing (10) since then, particularly after 1974, the year of the awarding of the Nobel Prize in economics to F. A. Hayek. (11)

II. Evidence 

In my assessment, if there is some very limited support for the Panglossian hypothesis, there is much more for the more critical realistic one. Consider the following points. 

1. The “Review of Austrian Economics” 

Exhibit A in this regard may well be the introduction to the first issue of the Review of Austrian Economics. State its editors (Rothbard and Block, 1987, xi): “The existence of the Review of Austrian Economics will resolve some dilemmas now faced by Austrian-oriented researchers who attempt to publish in the mainline journals. Articles that simply assume a familiarity on the part of the profession with methodological norms and theoretical developments within the Austrian tradition are unlikely to be published; the profession, by and large, has no such familiarity. Articles that devote substantial space to stating and defending the methodological norms and retracing the theoretical development are also unlikely to be published; they are seen, and correctly so, as unoriginal. Articles whose backgrounds are extensive in absolute terms but brief in relation to the remainder of the article do not constitute a workable compromise; they are rejected on the basis of length. These constraints do not totally preclude the publication of Austrian-oriented articles in mainline journals, but they make such events much more difficult. The Review of Austrian Economics will allow the praxeologically oriented researcher to assume a certain familiarity with the Austrian literature on the part of its readers.”

Note the cordial tone of these authors. Bias against the praxeological school nowhere appears in this “Introductory Editorial.” Even apart from that, though, as we can see, there are strong barriers against the acceptance of Austrian analysis in the pages of mainstream journals. “Doing good work” will scarcely overcome them.

2. The Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) 

Klein and Chiang (2005) state: “Thus, the SSCI is an important component in the academic apparatus of rank and prestige. Those who decide which journals are to be included in the SSCI exercise an enormous influence over the social sciences. But surprisingly little scrutiny has been given to SSCI and its journal selection process—I have searched on “SSCI” in ISI’s own Web of Science and found little pertinent to this investigation. In fact, in reading the scientometricians, including the economists who work with citation data, one perceives an attitude that Citation is of a divine and immaculate nature. The researchers who work with citation data almost never so much as raise a question about who is making the all-important decisions about journal inclusion, how they make those decisions, and whether they are fair or reasonable. This paper seems to be the first critical examination of SSCI.”

These authors have uncovered a sort of intellectual “Catch 22” which works to the detriment of the Austrian School. Prestige of the economics departments of universities is based to a significant degree upon the prestige of the scholarly journals in which they publish. And who are the gatekeepers (the editors and referees) of the latter? Why, members of the former.

3. Other biases 

According to Holcombe (2004) “… economists working in the Austrian tradition seem to be more inclined to publish their ideas in books rather than journal articles, perhaps creating a bias against such scholars. There are two journals aimed explicitly at publishing Austrian economics, The Review of Austrian Economics and The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, but neither is in the ISI/SSCI database. For obvious reasons, this could push young scholars interested in the ideas of the Austrian school, but hoping to achieve tenure at a research university, toward doing more mainstream types of research.”

I think this author, in an attempt to be measured, understates the matter. I would go further. I do not think that such a phenomenon merely “could” push young scholars, and, indeed, all academics interested in tenure and promotion, in a non Austrian direction; I would maintain that it does, and has done in the past. While I have no data to support this contention, I rest my case (12) on the nature of demand curves to be downward sloping.

4. The Fed rears its ugly head 

Consider the sad story of the Fed’s takeover of large parts of the economics profession (Higgs, 2009; Grim, 2009, Auerbach, 2008), particularly that aspect of it concerned with monetary, banking and business cycle analysis. The central bank of the U.S. has practically turned monetary economists into a totally (well, largely) owned subsidiary of itself. According to Grim (2009): “Auerbach (2008) found that in 1992, roughly 968 members of the AEA designated “domestic monetary and financial theory and institutions” as their primary field, and 717 designated it as their secondary field. Combining his numbers with the current ones from the AEA and NABE, it’s fair to conclude that there are something like 1,000 to 1,500 monetary economists working across the country. Add up the 220 economist jobs at the Board of Governors along with regional bank hires and contracted economists, and the Fed employs or contracts with easily 500 economists at any given time. Add in those who have previously worked for the Fed − or who hope to one day soon − and you’ve accounted for a very significant majority of the field.”

It is a veritable staple of the dismal science that businessmen often put their private interests over that of others. Public choice economists call this “rent seeking.” (13) Perhaps Smith (1776) said it best: “Seldom do businessmen of the same trade get together but that it results in some detriment to the general public.” It would appear that this moral failing applies not only to commercial interests, but to academic economists as well. These purchased mainstream monetary economists are not stupid. (14) They know on which side of their bread the butter is to be found: on the Fed side.

5. Sherwin Rosen 

Rosen (1997) threw down the gauntlet at the Austrians. He asks the question: “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains from Trade?,” and answers that if there are any at all, they are pretty paltry. So much so, that members of this school of thought would do well not to set up their own refereed journals, and, instead, abide by the assessment of the mainstream as to the value of their intellectual contribution. (15)

Why? Because they have lost the “market test” of truth; there are, after all, more neoclassical economists now practicing, than there are members of the praxeological school. In response to this sally, Yeager (1997, p. 159) replies to Rosen (1997): “He evidently holds it against the Austrians that they do not pass his market test in the intellectual atmosphere created by members of his own camp, an atmosphere pervaded by narrow yet tacit methodological preaching.” 

Rosen (1997) insists that the Austrians play by the rules set up by members of his own school of economics, acknowledge the legitimacy of neoclassical editors and referees, and not try to set up their own alternative institutions. How is this different from the manner in which Prof. Jones treats the global warming deniers? Consider the following gem: “In one e-mail, the center’s director, Phil Jones, writes Pennsylvania State University’s Michael E. Mann and questions whether the work of academics that question the link between human activities and global warming deserve to make it into the prestigious IPCC report, which represents the global consensus view on climate science.

“‘I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report,’ Jones writes. ‘Kevin and I will keep them out somehow–even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!’

“In another, Jones and Mann discuss how they can pressure an academic journal not to accept the work of climate skeptics with whom they disagree. ‘Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal,’ Mann writes. . . .” (16)

Yes, to be sure there are differences in the two cases. The freezing out of the economics “deniers” is far more subtle and implicit than in the case of environmentalism. And, also, it looks as if the former will far more longer endure than the latter, which is now the subject of widespread disgust and derision. 

III. Conclusion 

There is reason to believe that there are strong parallels between the mainstream economists’ treatment of the Austrian School of Economics, and the mainstream school of environmentalism’s treatment of the Anthropogenic Global Warming “deniers.” While there is now an uncovered smoking gun in the latter but not the former case, there is enough evidence in the economic realm to seriously consider this hypothesis.

References: 

Anderson, Terry and P.J. Hill, 1967. “The Evolution of Property Rights,” American Economic Review, papers and proceedings

Anderson, William L. 2009. “The Meaning of ‘Climategate,’“ December 7; http://www.lewrockwell.com/anderson/anderson272.html

Anderson, William L. 2000. “Austrian Economics and the ‘Market Test’: A Comment on Laband and Tollison.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(3): 63-73. Appraisal.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(1): 43-48.

Auerbach, Robert D. 2008. Deception and Abuse at the Fed: Henry B. Gonzalez Battles Alan Greenspan’s Bank; Austin, TX: University of Texas Press

Barnett, William and Walter Block. 2010. “Mises never used demand curves; was he wrong? Ignorant? No: The Antimathematicality of Demand Curves.” Dialogue, Vol. 1, pp. 23-31; March; http://www.uni-svishtov.bg/dialog/2010/1.10.WB.pdf

Barnett, William II and Walter Block. 2006. “Tyler Cowen on Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Critique.” New Perspectives on Political Economy, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 26-84; http://pcpe.libinst.cz/nppe/2_2/nppe2_2_2.pdf; http://pcpe.libinst.cz/nppe/

Block, Walter, Christopher Westley and Alex Padilla. 2008. “Internal vs. external explanations: a new perspective on the history of economic thought,” Procesos De Mercado: Revista Europea De Economia Politica; issue 2, pp. 35-132; http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/listaarticulos?tipo_busqueda=EJEMPLAR&revista_busqueda=6790&c lave_busqueda=217457 

Block, Walter. 1999. “Austrian Theorizing, Recalling the Foundations: Reply to Caplan,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 2, No. 4, winter, pp. 21-39; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae2_4_2.pdf
errata: http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae2_4_9.pdf 

Block, Walter. 2000A. “Watch Your Language,” February 21; http://www.mises.org/fullarticle.asp?control=385&month=17&title=Watch+Your+Language&id=19

Block, Walter. 2000B. Austrian Journals: A Critique of Rosen, Yeager, Laband and Tollison and Vedder and Gallaway,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, Summer, pp. 45-61; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae3_2_4.pdf

Block, Walter. 2003. “Realism: Austrian vs. Neoclassical Economics, Reply to Caplan,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 6, No. 3, Fall, pp. 63-76; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_3_4.pdf

Block, Walter. 2005. “Rejoinder to Caplan on Bayesian Economics,” Journal of Libertarian Studies. Vol. 19, No. 1, Winter, pp. 79-95; http://blog.mises.org/blog/archives/003654.asp

Block, Walter. 2007. “Reply to Caplan on Austrian Economic Methodology” Corporate Ownership & Control, Vol. 4, No. 2, November, pp. 312-325.

Booker, Christopher. 2009. “Climategate reveals ‘the most influential tree in the world,’“ December 5; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6738111/Climategate-reveals-themost-influential-tree-in-the-world.html

Buchanan, James M. and G.F. Thirlby. 1981. L.S.E. Essays on Cost, New York: New York University Press.

Buchanan, James M. 1969. Cost and Choice: An Inquiry into Economic Theory, Chicago: Markham

Callahan, Gene. 2003. “Choice and Preference,” February 10; http://mises.org/story/1163

Caplan, Bryan. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations,” Southern Economic Journal, April, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 823-838; http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/ausfin2.doc

Carilli, Anthony M., and Dempster, Gregory M. 2003. “A note on the treatment of uncertainty in economics and finance” Journal of Education for Business 79.2 Nov. 1, pp. 99-103.

Cowen, Tyler and Kroszner, Randy. 1987. “The Development of the New Monetary Economics,” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (3): 567-590.

Cowen, Tyler and Richard Fink. 1985. “Inconsistent Equilibrium Constructs: The Evenly Rotating Economy of Mises and Rothbard.” American Economic Review, Volume 75, Number 4, September, pp. 866-869

Frech III, H.E. 1976. “The Property Rights Theory of the Firm: Empirical Results from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 1 (February): 143-152 

Garrison, Roger W. 1985.”Predictable Behavior: Comment,” American Economic Review, 75(3) June, pp. 576-78; http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/j7rheiner.html;
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1814830

Gold, Thomas. 1989. “The inertia of scientific thought.” Speculations in Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 245-253, reprinted as: “New ideas in science” Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 3, No. 2, p 103 – 112; http://www.suppressedscience.net/inertiaofscientificthought.html 

Grim, Ryan. 2009. “Priceless: How The Federal Reserve Bought The Economics Profession.” October 23; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/07/priceless-how-the-federal_n_278805.html 

Heiner, Ronald. 1983. “The Origin of Predictable Behavior,” American Economic Review, 73:560-595 

Higgs, Robert. 2009. A Reader’s Guide to Bernanke’s Preemptive Attack.” November 30; http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs137.html 

Holcombe, Randall G. 2004. “The National Research Council Ranking of Research Universities: Its Impact on Research in Economics.” Econ Journal Watch, Vol. 1, No. 3, December, pp. 498-514; http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/HolcombeInvestigating1December2004.pdf 

Hoppe, Hans Hermann. 2005. “Must Austrians Embrace Indifference?,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 8, No. 4, Winter, pp. 87-91; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae8_4_6.pdf 

Hoppe, Hans Hermann. 2007. “The limits of numerical probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and the frequency interpretation.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, spring: 3–21; http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae10_1_1.pdf 

Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 2, Num. 4, pp. 1-20; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae2_4_1.pdf 

Kirzner, Israel M. 1963. “Reply.” Journal of Political Economy. February. 82-85. 

Kirzner, Israel, M. 1962. “Rational Action and Economic Theory,” Journal of Political Economy. August. 380-385. 

Klein, Daniel B., with Erich Chiang. 2005. “The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box –with an Ideological Bias?” Econ Journal Watch. Vol. 1, No. 1, April, pp. 134-165; http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/Klein-Chiang%20Investigating%20April%202004.pdf 

Laband, David N. and Robert D. Tollison. 2000. “On Secondhandism and Scientific 

Leeson, Peter T. 2007. “An-arrgh-chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate Organization,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 115, No. 6, pp. 1049-1094

Lott, John. 2009. “Surprise, Surprise, Many Scientists Disagree On Global Warming,” December 8; http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/08/john-lott-climate-gate-global-warming-east-anglia/ 

Machaj, Mateusz. 2007. “A Praxeological Case for Homogeneity and Indifference.” New Perspectives on Political Economy, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 231 – 238; http://pcpe.libinst.cz/nppe/3_2/nppe3_2_5.pdf 

Machlup, Fritz. 1967. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial,” American Economic Review, 57:1-33 

Murphy, Robert P. 2008. “Austrian Realists.” July 17; http://mises.org/story/3028 

Murphy, Robert P., Robert Wutscher and Walter E. Block. 2010. “Mathematics in Economics: An Austrian Methodological Critique.” Philosophical Investigations, January, Vol. 33, No 1, pp. 44-66; http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123209256/PDFSTART 

North, Gary. 2009. “The Myth of Neutral Academic Peer Review Exploded.” December 9; http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north791.html 

Rockwell, Llewellyn H., Jr. 2009 “The Left Fell into the Climate Morass,” December 7; http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/lost-left-climate-morass136.html 

Rosen, Sherwin. 1997. “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains from Trade?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11(4): 139-152; http://www.econ.ucla.edu/doepke/teaching/resources/e202ros.pdf 

Rothbard, Murray N. 1951a. “Mises’ ‘Human Action’: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 41 No. 1: 181-185. 

Rothbard, Murray N. 1951b. “Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller.” American Economic Review Vol. 41 No. 5: 943-946. 

Rothbard, M. N. [1962] 1993, Man, Economy, and State (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL.). 

Rothbard, Murray N., and Walter Block. 1987. “Introductory Editorial,” The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 1, 1987, pp. xi-xiii; http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE1_1_1.pdf 

Salerno, Joseph. 2002. “The Rebirth of Austrian Economics–in Light of Austrian Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 111-128, Winter; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae5_4_8.pdf 

Stringham, Edward, and White, Mark. 2004. ”Economic Analysis of Tort Law: Austrian and Kantian Perspectives” in Law and Economics: Alternative Economic Approaches to Legal and Regulatory Issues, Margaret Oppenheimer and Nicholas Mercuro (editors) New York: M.E. Sharpe, 374-92. http://www.sjsu.edu/stringham/docs/Stringham-and-White2005.pdf 

Stringham, Edward. 2001. “Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency and the Problem of Central Planning” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Summer) 41-50; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae4_2_3.pdf 

Stringham, Edward. 2008. “Economic Value and Cost Are Subjective” in The Handbook of Austrian Economics, Peter Boettke (editor), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, http://mises.org/journals/scholar/stringham4.pdf 

Thornton, Mark. 2004. “Does Academic Publishing Pass the Real Market Test?,” Public Choice, Springer, vol. 120(1_2), pages 41-61, 07. 

Vedder, R. and L. Gallaway. 2000. “The Austrian Market Share in the Marketplace for Ideas, 1871- 2025.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(1): 33-42; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae3_1_3.pdf 

White, Lawrence H. 1984. “Competitive Payments Systems and the Unit of Account,” American Economic Review, 74(4) September, 699-712 

Yeager, L. B. 2000. “The Tactics of Secondhandism.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(3): 51-61 

Yeager, Leland. 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neoclassicism, and the Market Test,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 4, Fall 1997, pp. 153-163 

Notes

(1) Anderson, 2009; Booker, 2009; Lott, 2009; North, 2009; Rockwell, 2009 

(2) See the following in this regard: http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/settled-science.html; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.html?mod=djemEditorialPage; http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/new-zealand-climategate.html; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704342404574576073505546070.html?mod=djemEditorialPage; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704779704574552533758682774.html; http://www.blogowogo.com/blog_article.php?aid=2491499; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574572093483921568.html?mod=djemEditorialPage; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704342404574578012533089846.html?mod=djemEditorialPage; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704342404574576073505546070.html?mod=djemEditorialPage 

(3) For a few exceptions that prove the rule, see http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125452487696260701.html; http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125815706103247805.html; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574443600711779692.html 

(4) Dan Klein (see Klein and Chiang, 2005), editor of EconJournal Watch also deserves mention in this regard. 

(5) The position of Peter Boettke is more than passing curious. On the one hand, he buys into the notion that it is not the fault of an unfair mainstream that Austrians do not get more of a hearing within the profession. The recipe is for Austrians to do more and better research. When they do, they will be welcomed with open arms by the neoclassicals. There is this no need for refereed journals specifically created to promote Austrian research, on the ground that the mainstream will not appreciate it. On the other hand, he serves as editor of RAE, a refereed journal as its name implies, devoted to focusing on Austrian economics. Who says contradictions can’t exist in nature? 

(6) We are now discussing modern Austrians, who I operationally define as published after 1950. BohmBawerk and Hayek, for example, were regular publishers in this literature. See for example, Anderson and Hill, 1967; Cowen and Fink, 1985; Cowen and Kroszner, 1987; Frech, 1976; Garrison, 1985; Heiner, 1983; Kirzner, 1962, 1963; Leeson, 2007; Machlup, 1967; Rothbard, 1951a, 1951b; White, 1984. 

(7) As but one indication of this phenomenon, Leeson, 2009 (a book length expansion of Leeson, 2007) is very light on Austrianism. In Leeson, 2009, prominent mention is made of leading neoclassical economists such as Daron Acemoglu, Gary Becker, James Buchanan, Ronald Coase, G. Warren Nutter, Charles Tiebout, Gordon Tullock. To be sure, Hayek is treated in a similar manner, but among the missing, at least from the index, are Austrians Eugen Bohm-Bawerk, Hans Hermann Hoppe, Israel Kirzner, Carl Menger and Murray N. Rothbard; Ludwig von Mises’s “Socialism” is mentioned on p. 180, and in the index, but does not appear in the footnote section. Buchanan was an Austrian economist when he wrote Buchanan, (1969) and Buchanan and Thirlby (1981), but has subsequently renounced the praxeological school as a “cult.”

(8) Cowen’s Austrian credentials have been called into question by Barnett and Block, 2006. 

(9) Caplan (1999), although not appearing in a top journal, is another case on point regarding the publication of attacks on Austrianism appearing mainstream journals. Interestingly, the Southern Economic Journal rejected several rejoinders to Caplan (Block, 1999, Hulsmann, 1999), which were then published elsewhere, mainly in “movement” Austrian scholarly periodicals. It is not too extreme a hypothesis to claim that without these other journals, Caplan’s attack would have gone unanswered in the scholarly literature. See on this: Block, 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007; Callahan, 2003; Carilli and Dempster, 2003; Hoppe, 2005, 2007; Hulsmann, 1999; Machaj, 2007; Murphy, 2008; Murphy, Wutscher and Block, 2010; Stringham, 2001, 2008; Stringham and White, 2004. 

(10) It would be ideal to know the rejection rate for Austrians and non Austrians in the mainstream academic literature. Unfortunately, no such statistics are available. 

(11) Salerno (2002), however, correctly in my view, dates the renaissance of praxeology not to this year, but rather to about a decade earlier, the year of first publication of Rothbard (1962). 

(12) As the co-author of Barnett and Block (2010), I cannot rest my case too strongly on this consideration. 

(13) For a critique of this nomenclature, but not of the underlying concept, see Block (2000A).

(14) They are merely evil to the extent they allow their analysis and conclusions to be determined by whoever it is that is paying the piper and calling the tune. 

(15) Critics of Austrianism include Rosen (1997), Vedder and Gallaway (2000) and Laband and Tollison (2000); see rejoinders by Anderson (2000), Block (2000), Block Westley and Padilla, 2008; Thornton, 2004; Yeager (1997, 2000)

(16) http://www.therightreasons.net/index.php?/topic/17429-green-totalitarianism/ 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Walter Block

Walter Block

Walter Block is the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at Loyola University, senior fellow of the Mises Institute, and regular columnist for LewRockwell.com.

This Post Has 147 Comments

  1. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  2. удалите,пожалуйста!

  3. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  4. Some truly fantastic posts on this website , thankyou for contribution. Hester Rinaldo Catto

  5. I visited various sites but the audio quality for audio songs existing at this site is really fabulous. Venus Elisha Monique

  6. Some really nice and utilitarian information on this site, also I think the layout holds superb features. Adaline Lockwood Critchfield

  7. Thank you ever so for you blog article. Really thank you! Awesome. Marrilee Laurens Dante

  8. Wow, this article is fastidious, my younger sister is analyzing such things, so I am going to inform her. Antonietta Boyce Alvin

  9. Packed with avant-garde sex playthings as well as underwear. Georgetta Rick Colville

  10. This post gives clear idea in favor of the new users of blogging, that genuinely how to do blogging. Ginni Michail Dotty

  11. Tremendous issues here. I am very satisfied to see your article. Trudie Raleigh Tiffanle

  12. Great post! We are linking to this great article on our website. Keep up the great writing. Cathryn Sig Ballman

  13. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

  14. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  15. posetlerde kampanya yaptik

  16. doktorlarimiza burdan ulaşabilirsiniz.

  17. bursanın gülleri

  18. aysegul naber canim?

  19. Novosti

  20. urenrjrjkvnm

  21. news

  22. Ukraine

  23. Med

  24. Good post. I absolutely appreciate this site. Keep it up! Chelsie Gran Coy

  25. Excellent post. I certainly love this website. Keep it up! Shanda Kasper Dibbrun

  26. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  27. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  28. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  29. This post is invaluable. When can I find out more? Ediva Bradly McCollum

  30. coin

  31. urenrjrjkvnm

  32. Pola makan dengan jadwal teratur memang salah satu cara ajarkan pola hidup sehat buat anak-anak kita. Adda Arlan Ful

  33. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  34. Ukraine

  35. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  36. news

  37. news

  38. coin

  39. news

  40. urenrjrjkvnm

  41. coin

  42. Novosti

  43. Howdy would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  44. news

  45. coin

  46. Novosti

  47. Cinema

  48. coin

  49. coin

  50. Life

  51. urenrjrjkvnm

  52. urenrjrjkvnm

  53. Med

  54. urenrjrjkvnm

  55. coin

  56. urenrjrjkvnm

  57. Novyny

  58. Ukraine

  59. Cinema

  60. coin

  61. urenrjrjkvnm

  62. Cinema

  63. Thank you, I have recently been searching for info about this
    subject for a while and yours is the best I’ve discovered till
    now. However, what concerning the conclusion? Are you certain about the supply?

  64. Thanks for a marvelous posting! I seriously enjoyed reading it,
    you’re a great author. I will remember to bookmark
    your blog and definitely will come back in the foreseeable future.
    I want to encourage one to continue your great work, have a nice evening!

    Also visit my web blog :: best CBD for dogs

  65. Hi to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one is getting more from this
    web page, and your views are pleasant in support of new visitors.

  66. Good day! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog.
    Is it tough to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out
    pretty fast. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure where to start.
    Do you have any tips or suggestions? With thanks

  67. You are so awesome! I do not suppose I have read through a single thing like
    that before. So wonderful to discover another person with some genuine thoughts
    on this topic. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up.

    This site is one thing that’s needed on the internet, someone
    with some originality!

  68. You are so awesome! I don’t believe I’ve read through a single thing like
    this before. So wonderful to find someone with unique thoughts on this issue.
    Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This
    web site is one thing that is required on the
    web, someone with a little originality!

  69. I am regular reader, how are you everybody?

    This post posted at this web page is truly good.

  70. Great beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog site?
    The account helped me a appropriate deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your
    broadcast provided brilliant clear idea

    Look at my web site; best CBD oil for dogs

  71. My spouse and I stumbled over here different page and thought
    I may as well check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to finding out about your web page yet
    again.

  72. I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing
    this blog. I really hope to view the same high-grade content by you in the future as well.
    In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged
    me to get my own, personal blog now 😉

  73. urenrjrjkvnm

  74. urenrjrjkvnm

  75. coin

  76. Life

  77. Med

  78. Can I simply just say what a comfort to uncover someone who actually understands what they’re talking about
    on the web. You actually understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important.
    More and more people must check this out and understand this side of the story.
    I was surprised you’re not more popular given that you definitely possess
    the gift.

  79. This video is presenting does vital flow work but also try to cover the following subject:https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Health—Wellness-Website/Vital-flow-reviews-102135748499657/

    -vital flow for prostate

    -vitalflow prostate really works

    -vitalflow prostate support reviews

    One thing I noticed when I was researching info on does
    vital flow work was the absence of appropriate details.

    Does vital flow work nevertheless is an subject that I know something
    about. This video therefore should be relevant
    and of interest to you.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Follow our video clips about does vital flow work as well as other comparable topics on

    Thanks for finally writing about > Climate science research
    is rigged: but what about economics? – Walter E.
    Block < Liked it!

  80. Novyny

  81. urenrjrjkvnm

  82. urenrjrjkvnm

  83. coin

  84. urenrjrjkvnm

  85. Novyny

  86. Med

  87. What i don’t realize is in reality how you’re no longer really a
    lot more well-liked than you may be right now. You’re so intelligent.
    You realize therefore significantly in relation to
    this matter, produced me individually imagine it from
    a lot of various angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated until it
    is something to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs great.
    At all times care for it up!

  88. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your
    website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here
    and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create
    your theme? Exceptional work!

  89. удалите,пожалуйста! .

  90. I like it when people get together and share opinions.
    Great website, continue the good work!

  91. Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with Search Engine
    Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results.
    If you know of any please share. Many thanks!

  92. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog?
    My website is in the exact same niche as yours and my visitors would genuinely benefit from a lot of the
    information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you.
    Thanks!

  93. Wow, that’s what I was searching for, what a data!
    existing here at this blog, thanks admin of
    this site.

  94. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my
    blog shine. Please let me know where you got your theme.
    With thanks

  95. wonderful post, very informative. I ponder why the opposite specialists of this sector do not understand this.
    You must proceed your writing. I am sure, you’ve a huge
    readers’ base already!

  96. Hi, everything is going well here and ofcourse every one is sharing
    facts, that’s genuinely fine, keep up writing.

  97. Hello, yeah this post is really fastidious and I have learned
    lot of things from it on the topic of blogging.
    thanks.

  98. urenrjrjkvnm

  99. urenrjrjkvnm

  100. Novosti

  101. With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement?
    My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement.
    Do you know any solutions to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d truly appreciate it.

    Also visit my homepage – CBD gummies for sale

  102. Türkiyenin en iyi leke kremi satış sitesini ziyaret ettiniz mi?
    en iyi leke cilt bakım setleri için sitemizi mutlaka ziyaret ederek
    leke kremi hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilirsiniz

  103. Novosti

  104. Great blog here! Also your web site loads up fast! What web host are you
    using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host?

    I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  105. I’m curious to find out what blog system you are using?
    I’m experiencing some minor security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more
    safe. Do you have any recommendations?

  106. Your method of telling everything in this paragraph is
    really pleasant, every one be able to simply be aware
    of it, Thanks a lot.

  107. Novosti

  108. Great blog you have here.. It’s hard to find excellent writing
    like yours these days. I seriously appreciate individuals like you!

    Take care!!

    Here is my page … buy cbd gummies

  109. cilt bakım seti,cilt bakım,cilt bakım
    ürünleri,kırışıklık serumu,Yüz Bakım Seti,yaşlanma karşıtı krem,cilt bakım,Yüz bakım
    ürünleri ve en önemli ürünlerden olan leke kremi satın alınacak en iyi site
    lekekremim.com

  110. Hello i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anyplace, when i read this article i thought i
    could also create comment due to this good article.

  111. I love it whenever people get together and share ideas.
    Great website, continue the good work!

  112. I got this site from my pal who told me about this web site and at the moment
    this time I am browsing this web page and reading very informative articles at
    this time.

  113. Wow! Finally I got a blog from where I be able to in fact take useful information regarding my study and knowledge.

    Here is my web-site – best CBD gummies

  114. For hottest information you have to pay a quick visit world-wide-web and on web I found this website as a best web site for most recent updates.

  115. Hi there to every body, it’s my first visit of this weblog; this webpage contains
    amazing and genuinely excellent data in support
    of visitors.

  116. Thanks for any other informative site. The place else may just I am getting that kind of information written in such an ideal manner?
    I’ve a undertaking that I am simply now operating on, and I’ve
    been on the look out for such information.

  117. When someone writes an article he/she retains the plan of a
    user in his/her mind that how a user can be aware of it. Therefore that’s why this piece of
    writing is perfect. Thanks!

  118. haber sitesi olan fakat antalya haber olarak gündelik haberlerinizi okumaya hazırmısnız?
    antalyanın havadisi havadis07.com la biliniyor

  119. This is my first time visit at here and
    i am actually pleassant to read all at alone place.

  120. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my blog so i came to
    “return the favor”.I am attempting to find things to enhance my website!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!

    Also visit my web-site: delta 8 near me

  121. What’s up, I log on to your blogs regularly. Your story-telling style is witty, keep it up!

    Visit my webpage :: delta 8

  122. If you desire to get a good deal from this post then you have to apply these techniques to your won web site.

    Feel free to surf to my site – cbd gummies

  123. An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a co-worker who was conducting a little research on this.
    And he in fact bought me dinner due to the fact that
    I discovered it for him… lol. So let me reword this….
    Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to
    talk about this issue here on your site.

    Also visit my web blog … cbd products

  124. I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this
    sort of space . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website.
    Studying this info So i’m satisfied to express that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed.
    I so much definitely will make sure to don?t fail to remember this website and provides it a look on a relentless basis.

    Here is my page – CBD gummies for pain

  125. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and everything. However just imagine if you added
    some great visuals or videos to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this website could certainly be one of the best in its field.

    Superb blog!

    my website cbd for sale

  126. Hey very cool site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also?
    I’m glad to find so many useful information right
    here within the submit, we’d like develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing.
    . . . . .

    Stop by my website; cbd products

Leave a Reply